steve142857 Posted October 15, 2012 Report Share Posted October 15, 2012 Not my best run, but gives a good idea. I compared older videos of the SHO accelerating and it is crazy the improvement! Here are a few comparos: Stock with springs / adding Livernois stage 4+, airaid and exhaust / adding meth and changing to stage 5 0-60 mph: 5.5 / 4.1 / 3.6 0-100 mph: 13.0 / 10.5 / 8.9 0-125 mph: ? (est.21.0) / 16.5 / 13.9 Looking forward to see the numbers with bigger turbos and downpipes! I know I'll make a video, but it'd be great for Darrell and Mike to film a few runs to make us salive... ; ) Oh yeah... Thamks to Livernois... again! lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
griggs95 Posted October 23, 2012 Report Share Posted October 23, 2012 That's quick! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tss Posted October 23, 2012 Report Share Posted October 23, 2012 Very quick! Wow! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FGirard Posted October 23, 2012 Report Share Posted October 23, 2012 malade sa avance en maudit ton SHO ! moi javais un subaru STI05 avant stage 2 Jtrouvais sa pas pire ! mais la toi wow! en plus cest sleeper Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigPelo Posted October 23, 2012 Report Share Posted October 23, 2012 malade sa avance en maudit ton SHO ! moi javais un subaru STI05 avant stage 2 Jtrouvais sa pas pire ! mais la toi wow! en plus cest sleeper W00t! ça parle français maintenant ici? :canada: Thue that this SHO haul asses! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve142857 Posted October 23, 2012 Author Report Share Posted October 23, 2012 Thanks guys! It gives a good idea of how the car moves as of now... On that video, the car was cool, but the brakes too and when I staged, I started to brake/torque and when I reached 1,800 rpm, the car started moving forward and I could launch as high as usual, which is why the 0-60 is a bit slower than usual... The 60' was 1.91 on that run instead of low 1.80's... But after that, no excuse, just that my best runs were done when temps were in the 50's outside... not in that video. Cheers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulford8 Posted October 23, 2012 Report Share Posted October 23, 2012 Nice vid editing as always. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.